The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for lack of appearance by the applicant and no fresh representation, vacating an interim order dated 05.3.2020.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; interim order of 05.3.2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2043 of 2020
Applicant :- Mahendra Singh @ Jahir Baba Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Balbeer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application even when the case is called in the revised list. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Matter was previously listed on 29.7.2021 and on the said date there was no representation on behalf of the applicant. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed in nonprosecution.
Interim order dated 05.3.2020 is hereby vacated.
Learned State counsel is directed to inform the concerned Investigating Officer of this case about this order within a week.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 3.12.2021
Naresh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Singh @ Jahir Baba
State Of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
