Umesh Chandra v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 18686 of 2021
Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge-sheet has been submitted and credible evidence against the applicant has been collected, as such, the present anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Applicants' counsel have a remedy to approach before the court below and apply for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and the court concerned shall decide the same in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 4.12.2021 Nitin Verma
Umesh Chandra
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court