The applicant was arrested during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court held the application to be infructuous and dismissed it.
Present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15606 of 2021
Applicant :- Junaid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Puneet Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been arrested by the police during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application no more survives.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.9.2021 Sumit S
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application survives after the arrest of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Junaid
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
