Naeem v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15822 of 2021
Applicant :- Naeem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Case called out. None appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Learned A.G.A. has submitted that during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, the applicant was arrested by the police on 20.08.2021.
Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.9.2021 Sumit S
Digitally signed by RAHUL CHATURVEDI Date: 2021.09.09 11:06:37 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Naeem
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court