The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous, noting that the investigating officer had already submitted a chargesheet based on credible evidence against the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15161 of 2021
Applicant :- Archana Devi @ Rachana Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Alkesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Agrawal
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the present anticipatory bail application the investigating officer has submitted chargesheet after collecting credible evidence against the applicant, as such, the present anticipatory bail has become infructuous.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 SKD
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is maintainable being infructuous in light of the chargesheet already submitted by the investigating officer.
Whether the court can dismiss an anticipatory bail application as infructuous after the filing of chargesheet.
Whether the principles laid down in relevant case laws are applicable to decide the fate of the present application.
Archana Devi @ Rachana Devi
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
