The High Court of Allahabad (Court No. 67) rejected an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The rejection was based on the fact that the charge sheet had already been submitted, rendering the application infructuous.
Reflection of apprehension of arrest removed by rejecting the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1412 of 2020
Applicant :- Sanjeev Singh Tomar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Kakkar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard Shri Ashutosh Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A. files his counter affidavit which is taken on record. He further stated that in this matter charge sheet has been submitted way back on 24.4.2020, and therefore, this anticipatory bail has rendered infructuous.
Under circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application stands REJECTED.
Order Date :- 14.7.2021 M. Kumar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed given that the charge sheet has already been submitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeev Singh Tomar
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
