Allowed

Harendra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Jul 2021BAIL/11552/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant, facing prosecution under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, sought bail during trial. The court granted bail subject to conditions including court attendance, monthly police station reporting, and non-interference with witnesses or evidence.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties.

Harendra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 67

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11552 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Harendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Babul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Babul Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant virtually and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is facing prosecution in Case Crime No.01 of 2021, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.-Premnagar, District-Jhansi, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of his involvement in one other criminal case mentioned in gang chart, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit accompanying this bail application. It is also submitted that in addition to said one case mention in the gang chart, the applicant has got other cases to his credit. He next submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in all five criminal cases. The applicant has never misused the liberty of bail granted him earlier. The applicant is in jail since 10.2.2020, hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶8

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all aforesaid cases.

¶9

Keeping in view the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶10

Let the applicant, Harendra be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in aforesaid case crime, subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

(a). The applicant shall attend the court according to the

¶12

conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶13

(b). The applicant shall give a written undertaking to the court concerned after release that he would present in the concerned Police Station on the last Sunday of every month during 10.00 to 12.00 Noon. In case of any default, the In-charge, Police Station shall forthwith inform the concerned court about this breach.

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

It may be observed that in the event of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed for the cancellation of applicant's bail.

¶16

The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. Order Date :- 13.7.2021

¶17

M. Kumar

Harendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanoj Vs State of U.P.

Ikram and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Wasid Vs State of U.P.

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anuj Vs State of U.P.

Om Prakash Vs State of U.P.