Navab Julaha v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been granted regular bail by the lower court on a similar prayer.
Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been granted regular bail by the lower court on a similar prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13692 of 2021 Applicant :- Navab Julaha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as infructuous because the regular bail of the applicant has been granted by the court below.
Prayer made is allowed.
In these circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.10.2021 Arif
Navab Julaha
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court