Mohd Suaib@ Sueb Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC as infructuous because the charge sheet for the case had already been filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13508 of 2021
Applicant :- Mohd Suaib@ Sueb Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tahir Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that in this case, charge sheet has already been filed and the application has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.9.2021 Mini
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is maintainable given that the charge sheet has already been filed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd Suaib@ Sueb Ahmad
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/13508/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court