This Court rejected an anticipatory bail application because the applicants did not press the application. A direction was issued to the lower court for expedited disposal if the applicants surrender and file a regular bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10701 of 2021
Applicant :- Mannan And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Mohd. Shamim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants Mannan, Bhoolu @ Mohd. Kalam, Islam and Samir in Case Crime No. 174 of 2016, (Case No.6669 of 2017) (State Vs. Mannan and others), under sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354, 427 I.P.C., P.S. Rajghat, District Gorakhpur.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application provided that a direction be issued to the learned court below to dispose of the bail application of the applicants, if given, expeditiously on the same day.
In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application is rejected as not pressed.
A direction is however given to the court below that in case applicants surrender and give bail application, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously and preferably on the same day in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 22.9.2021 Mini
Mannan and 3 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
