This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicants stated that the charge sheet had already been filed. The order contains no reasoned elaboration.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12424 of 2021
Applicant :- Janardan And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Pandey,Harish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicants states that charge sheet has been filed in the present anticipatory bail, therefore, the present bail has rendered as infructuous, accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructous.
Order Date :- 15.7.2021 Nisha
Digitally signed by Justice Rahul Chaturvedi Date: 2021.07.16 12:17:00 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous after filing of charge sheet should be dismissed.
Janardan And 4 Others
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
