The single-judge court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant was arrested during its pendency, making the interim relief unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12184 of 2021
Applicant :- Ajendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Sri Dilip Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shams Uz Zaman, learned counsel for the applicant submits that during pendency of the present anticipatory bail, the applicant was arrested and thus the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous, accordingly, the preset application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.7.2021 Abhishek Sri.
Digitally signed by Justice Rahul Chaturvedi Date: 2021.07.19 14:54:06 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous warrants dismissal.
Ajendra
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
