The High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed in connection with offences under IPC 498A and 304B. The court found no exceptional grounds warranting the exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction.
Application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11353 of 2021
Applicant :- Goldy@Gaurav Jayant Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 547 of 2021, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC, Police Station- Kavi Nagar, DistrictGhaziabad.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 , this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 2.6.2021 Arshad
Digitally signed by Justice Rajeev Misra Date: 2021.06.03 09:37:07 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether exceptional grounds exist to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be granted or rejected.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementReferred¶7
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Goldy@Gaurav Jayant
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
