Saqib and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Court examined the complicity of the accused and Apex Court precedent, finding no exceptional ground to exercise discretionary jurisdiction, and consequently rejected the application.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10116 of 2021
Applicant :- Saqib And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Zakir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Mohammad Zakir, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Indrapal Singh Rajpoot, learned A.G.A. assisted by Mr. P.K. Sahi, learned brief-holder for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Saqib and Another in connection with Case Crime No.46 of 2021, under Sections 307, 504 I.P.C., Police StationNarsaina, District- Bulandshahar.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 , this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected .
Order Date :- 1.6.2021 Saif
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the present case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saqib And Another
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/10116/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court