Mohammad Istyak @ Istak and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 88

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7554 of 2021

Applicant :- Mohammad Istyak @ Istak And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicants for quashing the Non Bailable Warrant dated 17.7.2020 as well as order dated 5.1.2021 passed in S.S.T. No.237 of 2019 (State Vs. Istyak Usmani and others) arising out of Case Crime No.494 of 2018 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 447, 448, 452, 504, 506 IPC and 3(2)(Va) S.C./S.T. Act, P.S. Shahganj, District Agra pending in the court of Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Agra.

¶7

It is submitted by learned Counsel for the applicants that the applicants had not received any summons and have no knowledge about the pendency of criminal case.

¶8

After arguing the case for quite some time at length, learned counsel for the applicants himself has given up to address the Court on merits of the case and prayed, that the purpose of his clients would suffice, if a direction may be given to the court below to decide their bail application within specific time frame.

¶9

However, it is directed, that in case applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, the court below shall consider and decide the bail prayer of applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶10

For a period of 30 days from today or till disposal of bail application whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶11

With the above directions, present application is disposed off.

¶12

Order Date :- 5.8.2021 S. Singh

Mohammad Istyak @ Istak and 8 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Istyak @ Istak and 8 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chunku @ Ghanand Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Sanehi and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chhotkau @ Shri Krishna and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Goma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Faim and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Subeem Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others