Partly allowed
Charan Singh @ Tinku and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/4962/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings for malicious deprivation of property and criminal intimidation, the court held that disputed questions of fact could not be adjudicated. The prayer for quashing was refused. However, the court directed the trial court to dispose of the bail application expeditiously if applicants surrendered within 30 days and st
What did the court decide?
Refused quashing of proceedings; directed lower court to decide bail application expeditiously within 30 days if applicants surrender; stayed coercive action for 30 days.