Application for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 was filed by relatives of the respondent involved in dowry-related allegations. The court dismissed the application due to a lack of grounds for quashing in light of cited precedents and the nature of the allegations.
Prayer for quashing of criminal proceedings dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3933 of 2018
Applicant :- Ravi Prakash Saxena And 4 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Bipin Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
and harassment. No ground for quashing is made out in the light of the above-mentioned case laws, therefore, Application fails and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 8.9.2021 Ashutosh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceeding should be quashed given failed mediation and specific allegations of dowry demand and harassment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶7
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab; AIR 1960 SC 866 · Who else cites this
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan LalReferred¶7
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal; 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426 · Who else cites this
State of Bihar Vs. P.P. SharmaReferred¶7
State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma; 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 · Who else cites this
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs. Mohd. Saraful HaqReferred¶7
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (para 10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 · Who else cites this
Ravi Prakash Saxena and 4 Ors
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
