Shiv Shankar Sahu and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant sought to quash criminal proceedings. The court held that quashing required addressing factual disputes and evidence appreciation, beyond inherent powers. The applicant agreed not to press the quashing claim, instead applying for bail, leading the court to not exercise its jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings dismissed; applicant remains subject to court below's jurisdiction.