Disposed

Enamuddin v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2021A482/344/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant disclaimed necessity to argue grounds for quashing proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. Court refused quash but directed lower court to expeditiously consider bail if applicant appears and surrenders within 30 days, citing Supreme Court precedents on bail delays. No coercive action permitted during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to lower court to hear and dispose of bail application expeditiously within 30 days of applicant's appearance and surrender.

Enamuddin Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 84

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 344 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Enamuddin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shabana Nizam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shabana Nizam, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Arvind Kumar, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no. 1 and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant to quash the proceedings of Case No. 8721 of 2020 (State vs. Enamuddin) arising out of Case Crime No. 60 of 2020 under Sections 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Varanasi, pending in the Court of ACJM 02 Varanasi and the cognizance order dated 25.6.2020 passed by ACJM IInd Varanasi.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant at the very outset has fairly submitted that the necessary grounds for invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 CrPC have not been made out in the facts of the present case. Accordingly, he does not wish to press his prayer as made in the application.

¶8

In view of the above, the relief as sought in the instant application is refused.

¶9

At this stage counsel for the applicant has made an alternative prayer for a direction to be issued to the court below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant, expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that in case the applicant appears and surrenders before the concerned court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below in accordance with law keeping in view of the seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 CrLJ 755 as well as judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2009) 4 SCC 437.

¶11

For the period of 30 days from today or till the date of appearance of the applicant before the concerned court below,

¶12

whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the above case.

¶13

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 CrPC is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.1.2021 Shalini

¶15

(Dr. Y.K.Srivastava,J.)

Enamuddin v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Enamuddin v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Vs State of U.P. and Another

Matibar Pandey and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bajrang Bahadur and 3 Others Vs State of Up and Another

Rachhit Pandey (Minor) and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Yogendra and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Narendra @ Ravindra Kumar and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another