The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed in 2007 for want of prosecution, noting that the parties lost interest or the matter became infructuous due to the efflux of more than 14 years.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2924 of 2007
Applicant :- Sabir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Baleshwar Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present. Learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2007. More than 14 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicant may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 29.11.2021
Ankita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sabir
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
