The High Court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application filed in 2007 for want of prosecution. The court noted the applicants' absence and inordinate delay of over 14 years, rendering the matter infructuous.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22484 of 2007
Applicant :- Sanju Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case has been called out. None appears on behalf of the applicants even in the revised call. However, learned AGA for the State is present.
The present application is of the year 2007 and more than 14 years have passed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the instant matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
It is, however, provided that if cause of action still survives then learned counsel for the applicants may file an application for recalling this order.
Order Date :- 29.11.2021 SKM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to take into account the delay and lack of appearance of the applicant in disposal of a section 482 application.
Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inordinate delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanju Yadav And Another
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
