In this criminal appeal under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi, J. dismissed the application due to non-prosecution after the applicant and counsel were absent while the State's representative was present.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2850 of 2007
Applicant :- Anar Dei And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- S.K. Shamra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out in the revised list. Nobody is present for the applicants. However, learned A.G.A. is present for the Staterespondents.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.11.2021 Jaswant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable without anyone present for the applicant?
What is the effect of non-prosecution or applicant's absence on the disposal of an S. 482 application?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anar Dei And Others
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
