A brief order in which the High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC for non-appearance of the applicant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16814 of 2005
Applicant :- Chandra Kant Khemka And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Vashisth Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press the application.
The application is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.10.2021 Ak/
Chandra Kant Khemka
Another
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
