The High Court, for lack of appearance and due to the matter's high pendency since 2007, dismissed the Section 482 application as infructuous and for want of prosecution, vacating any interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24845 of 2007
Applicant :- Bhudev And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,K.M.Tripathi
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out. No one appears to press this application even in the revised call.
Learned AGA is present for the State-Respondents.
Mediation Report indicates that the opposite party no.2 has failed to appear in the mediation proceedings.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2007. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has rendered infructuous, that is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to intimate the Trial Court concerned about this order within a period of one month.
Order Date :- 2.12.2021 Siddhant
Bhudev And Others
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
