The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to the matter being pending since 2009 with no appearance from the applicant.
The application was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24179 of 2009
Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kameshwar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the application. Sri Sati Shankar, learned State Law Officer is present for State.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2009. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has been rendered infructuous. That is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to inform the trial court concerned about this order within a month.
Order Date :- 2.12.2021
Shalini
Ashok Kumar
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
