The High Court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application of 2007 for want of prosecution, observing that it had become infructuous due to the lapse of time and absence of the applicants on the listed date.
Application dismissed. Interim order, if any, vacated. Leave to recall granted subject to filing of a fresh application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2453 of 2007
Applicant :- Shakeel Ahmad And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- A. Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case has been called out. None appears on behalf of the applicants even in the revised call. However, learned AGA for the State is present.
The present application is of the year 2007 and listed under the heading 'Group of cases likely to be infructuous(without objection)'.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the instant matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
It is, however, made clear that if cause of action still survives then learned counsel for the applicants may file an application for recalling this order.
Order Date :- 10.11.2021 SKM
Shakeel Ahmad And Others
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
