In this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the court dismissed the matter for lack of prosecution following the efflux of time since 2007, noting the case had been listed as likely to become infructuous.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2451 of 2007
Applicant :- S.R. Agarwal @ Dr. Sant Ram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nitin Sharma,V.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,A.K. Rai,Ajay Rajendra,Amit Daga,D.K. Singh,Vivek K.Singh
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case has been called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call.
The present application is of the year 2007 and listed under the heading 'Group of cases likely to be infructuous(without objection)'.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the instant matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
It is, however, made clear that if cause of action still survives then learned counsel for the applicants may file an application for recalling this order.
Order Date :- 10.11.2021 SKM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the HCF under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2007 framed is maintainable and requires adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.R. Agarwal @ Dr. Sant Ram
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
