The Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC filed since 2007 as infructuous and for want of prosecution since no one appeared to press it.
The application is dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2270 of 2007
Applicant :- Kishan Singh And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the application. Mr. Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2007. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has rendered infructuous, that is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to inform the trial court concerned about this order within a month.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 SY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an unpressed application under Section 482 CrPC should be allowed to lie dormant due to efflux of time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishan Singh And Others
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
