The Hon'ble Court dismissed an old pending application under Section 482 CrPC filed in 2005 as infructuous and for want of prosecution, noting no one appeared to press it.
Application dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14633 of 2005
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Dubey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- T.B. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the application. Mr. Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2005. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has rendered infructuous, that is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to inform the trial court concerned about this order within a month.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 SY
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC filed in 2005 should be allowed after prolonged inactivity.
Whether the application has become infructuous due to the efflux of time and lack of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar Dubey
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
