In a Section 482 CrPC application, the court dismissed the matter as withdrawn after the applicant appeared and stated they did not wish to press the application.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1554 of 2021
Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Rai And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnikant Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aseem Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State/ opposite party no.1, Shri Assem Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the bar that he does not want to press this application and seeks to withdraw it.
In view of the statement made, this application under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed as withdrawn.
Certified copy of impugned order be returned back to counsel for the applicants as per Rules.
Order Date :- 10.11.2021 Nadim
Kripa Shanker Rai And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
