The court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution after noting a delay of more than 11 years and the absence of the applicant's counsel, rendering the matter infructuous.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13523 of 2009
Applicant :- Sant Lal Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kesh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present. Learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2009. More than 11 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicant may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021 AK Pandey
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sant Lal
Sameer Jain
AK Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
