The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., filed in 2009, for want of prosecution as over eleven years elapsed without the applicant pressing the matter before the court.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3342 of 2009
Applicant :- Khem Chand Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijendra Kumar,Sudhir Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Gorakh Yadav
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicants to press the present application. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present. Learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2009. More than 11 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicants may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021 AK Pandey
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khem Chand Sharma
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
