The High Court dismissed the applicant's application under Section 482 CrPC which was not pressed by counsel for an alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11764 of 2021
Applicant :- Veerpal Pundir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava,Alka Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Santosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not wish to press the application and that he would seek an appropriate legal remedy.
The application stands dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.8.2021 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
Veerpal Pundir
State of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
