The court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application filed in 2009 for want of prosecution, noting that over twelve years had elapsed, rendering the matter infructuous. Any interim order is vacated with liberty to recall.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11580 of 2009
Applicant :- Mohd. Chand And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Dubey,B.L. Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Nisaruddin
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicants to press the present application. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 is also not present. Learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2009. More than 12 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicants may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021
Ankita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 application can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to over twelve years of delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Chand And Others
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
