In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pending since the year 2006, the Court held that due to the efflux of time and lack of appearance by the applicant, the matter became infructuous.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10631 of 2006
Applicant :- Jeet Lal And Tohers Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.C. Kandpal,Sunil Kumar Yadav,Virendra Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case called out in the revised call. None appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the present application. Learned AGA for the State-respondent is present.
The present case is pending before this Court since the year 2006. More than a decade has already been passed.
It appears that by the efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest in the matter or it has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.10.2021 Ankita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeet Lal And Others
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
