Application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous for want of prosecution, noting parties were not present despite listing as such. Interim order vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5970 of 2007
Applicant :- M/S Ojha Trading Company And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vipin Sinha,Navin Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Government Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present for the parties to press this application though learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The present application is of the year 2007 and listed in the head of 'likely to be infructuous'. It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the instant matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. In case, if the cause of action still survives then applicants can move recall application for recalling this order.
Order Date :- 26.10.2021 AK Pandey
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Ojha Trading Company And Another
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
