Ashok Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This application under Section 482 of the CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution when no party appeared, though the Advocate General for the State was present.
This application under Section 482 of the CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution when no party appeared, though the Advocate General for the State was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10018 of 2007
Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
List is revised.
None appears for the parties. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.7.2021 RPD
Ashok Kumar Singh
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court