Petitioner sought dismissal of the Article 227 writ petition via counsel's statement. Court dismissed the petition as not pressed without considering merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7297 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt.Sushila Devi Mishra And 7 Others Respondent :- Yogendra Chaturvedi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Ayush Khanna
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the writ petition.
In view of the statement so made by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sri Atul Dayal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Anchal Ojha, advocate, is present for the respondent.
Order Date :- 9.12.2021 Kushal
Smt.Sushila Devi Mishra
Yogendra Chaturvedi
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
