Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Gupta v. Indra Kumar Jaiswal

Allahabad HC2 Dec 2021A227/7080/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the refusal of the Special Judge E.C. Act, Allahabad, to expedite its pending proceedings. Relying on a Division Bench precedent, the Court held that/subordinate courts cannot be directed to decide suits or other matters within a stipulated period via writ proceedings under Article 227. The petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to expedite proceedings was denied.

Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs Indra Kumar Jaiswal — Execution and Attachment | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 4

¶2

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7080 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Indra Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Adhin

¶4

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶5

This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶6

"(i) a suitable order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Special Judge E.C. Act, Court, Allahabad to expedite hearing of the S.C.C.R. No. 4 of 2019 (Indra Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Pawan Kumar Gupta) and decide the same at the earliest or within the reasonable period as this Hon'ble Court be pleased to stipulated in that regard."

¶7

From the perusal of the record, it transpires that the prayer has been made for early disposal of S.C.C.R. No. 4 of 2019 (Indra Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Pawan Kumar Gupta) pending in the court of Special Judge E.C. Act, Court, Allahabad.

¶8

The Division Bench of this Court in case of Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali Isteba, 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB) has held that no direction can be issued to the sub-ordinate courts for deciding the suit within stipulated period. Relevant portion of the judgment is extracted hereasunder:-

¶9

"We are not inclined to issue a direction for the expeditious hearing of a Civil Suit which is pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District-Azamgarh. It would be most inappropriate to Court to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 and/or under Article 227 of the Constitution simply for the purpose of expediting the hearing of a suit. Such orders, if granted, place a class of litigants, who move the court in a separate and preferential category whereas other cases which may be of similar or greater antiquity and urgency are left to be decided in the normal channel. Hence, any such direction may be issued with the greatest care and circumspection by the High Court otherwise the Civil Courts will be overburdened only with requests for expeditious disposal of suits, which have been expedited by the High Court. Most of the litigants cannot afford the expense of moving the High court and would not, therefore, be in a position to have the benefit of such an order.

¶10

Ultimately, it must be left to the judicious exercise of discretion of the concerned Court to determine whether a ground for urgency has been made out. We emphasize that there may be other cases such as involving senior citizens, those who are differently abled or people suffering from a

¶11

particular disablilty socio-economic or otherwise which may prime cause of urgent disposal. It is for the learned Trial Judge in each case to apply his or her mind and decide whether the hearing of the suit to be expedited.

¶12

For these reasons, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to cost."

¶13

In view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ali Shad Usmani (supra), this Court declines to grant the relief as prayed for.

¶14

The writ petitions is dismissed.

¶15

Order Date :- 2.12.2021 V.S.Singh

Pawan Kumar Gupta v. Indra Kumar Jaiswal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar Gupta v. Indra Kumar Jaiswal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shalini Vs Durgesh Mishra

Ms. Nagina Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Totaram Vs Smt. Nemwati Devi and 6 Others

Om Sharan Sahu Vs Dwarka Prasad

Abdul Rasheed Vs Govind Prasad Alias Bachcha and 2 Others

Santosh Kumar Shukla Vs Narendra Kumar Tiwari