Hearing under Indian Constitution Art 227 regarding Art 03/2017 judgment. Court explores Art 227 fiduciary relationship between petitioner and respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 58½
flfoy izdh.kZ ;kfpdk la[;k 6267 o"kZ 2021 ¼Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr½
lat; dqekj eYy ,oa vU; &&&&&& ;kphx.k izfr
Jhjke ;kno ,oa vU; &&&&& foi{khx.k
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g ;kfpdk] ;kphx.k@oknh }kjk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr bl U;k;ky; ds le{k bl ;kpuk ds lkFk ;ksftr dh x;h gS fd lEcfU/kr ijh{k.k U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tk, fd og ih0 ,0 okn la[;k 03 o"kZ 2017 ¼lat; eYy ,oa vU; izfr Jhjke ;kno½ tks fo}ku fu;r izkf/kdkjh@flfoy tt] ¼lhw0 fM0½] nsokfj;k ds U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS] dks fu/kkZfjr le; ds vUnj fuLrkfjr djsaA
;kphx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
;kphx.k@oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd ;kphx.k iz'uxr edku ds Lokeh gS rFkk foi{khx.k mlds fdjk;snkj gSA foi{khx.k u rks ;kphx.k dks fdjk;k vnk dj jgs gS ,oa u gh iz'uxr edku [kkyh dj jgs gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd ;kphx.k dks iz'uxr Hkou dh vko';drk gS ftlds lEca/k esa mUgksaus ;kfpdk la[;k 1271 o"kZ 2018 bl U;k;ky; ds le{k ;ksftr dh Fkh ftls bl U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 28&2&2018 ds }kjk iz'uxr izdj.k dks ;Fkk 'kh?kz fuLrkfjr djus gsrq fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vknsf'kr fd;k Fkk ijUrq blds ckotwn Hkh iz'uxr izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k ugha gks ldkA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd ;kphx.k us bl U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 28&2&2018 dh izekf.kr izfr fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr dj j[kk gSA bl izdkj dqy feykdj ;g ;kpuk dh x;h gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tk, fd og iz'uxr ekeys dk fuLrkj.k vfr 'kh?kz ojh;rk ds vk/kkj ij djsaA
2
leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s iz'uxr ekeyk bl vkns'k ds lkFk vafre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd ih0 ,0 okn la[;k 03 o"kZ 2017 ¼lat; eYy ,oa vU; izfr Jhjke ;kno½ tks fo}ku fu;r izkf/kdkjh@flfoy tt] ¼lhw0 fM0½] nsokfj;k ds U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS] dks og fcuk fdlh LFkxu ds &6 ekg ds vUnj fof/k vuqlkj fuLrkfjr djsaA ;fn fcuk fdlh leqfpr dkj.k ds i{kdkjksa }kjk LFkxu vkosnu i= vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; mu ij vf/kd tqekZuk fu/kkZfjr djsxsaA
;g Hkh Li"V jgs fd blds iwoZ Hkh bl U;k;ky; us iz'uxr ekeys ds 'kh?kz fuLrkj.k dk vkns'k fnukad 28&2&2018 dks ;kfpdk la[;k 1271 o"kZ 2018 esa fn;k Fkk ftldk vuqikyu lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh }kjk ugha fd;k x;k vkSj ;fn vc ;fn bl vkns'k dk vuqikyu le; lhek ds vUnj ugha fd;k x;k rks lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh ds fo:} oS/kkfud dk;Zokgh dh tk;sxhA fn0& 11&11&2021@v
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Art 227 fiduciary relationship exists between petitioner and respondent.
Whether Art 227 fiduciary relationship exists between petitioner and respondent (duplicate in source).
lat; dqekj eYy
Jhjke ;kno
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
