This bench considered a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an administrative order that adversely affects the future bright career path of the respondent, who is the trust's ward child-custody.
The judicial order impacting the career path of the child-custody respondent shall be recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½
flfoy izdh.kZ ;kfpdk la[;k 5603 o"kZ 2021 ¼Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr½
fl}kFkZ vktkn &&&&&& ;kph@oknh izfr jktdqekj jkor &&&&& foi{kh@izfroknh
ekuuh; 'k s[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g flfoy izdh.kZ ;kfpdk] ;kph@oknh }kjk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr bl U;k;ky; ds le{k bl ;kpuk ds lkFk ;ksftr dh x;h gS fd lEcfU/kr ijh{k.k U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tk, fd og ih0 ,0 okn la[;k 01 o"kZ 2018] esllZ e/kq dksyksukbZtlZ izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izfr jktdqekj jkor tks fo}ku flfoy tt] ¼ofj"B Js.kh½] bykgkckn ds U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS] dks fcuk fdlh LFkxu ds &6 ekg ds vUnj fuLrkfjr djsaA
;kph@oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
;kph@oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd ;kph@oknh iz'uxr edku dk Lokeh gS ,oa foi{kh] ;kph dk fdjk;snkj gSA iz'uxr edku th.kZ&{kh.kZ voLFkk esa gS ftldh gkyr vR;ar n;uh; gSA foi{kh mDr fdjk;snkjh okys Hkkx esa jg Hkh ugha jgk gS dsoy vuqfpr ykHk ikus ds fy, dksBjh esa rkyk can fd;s gq, gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd foi{kh le; ls fdjk;s dh vnk;xh Hkh ugha djrk gSA
leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s iz'uxr ekeyk bl vkns'k ds lkFk vafre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd ih0 ,0 okn la[;k 01 o"kZ 2018] esllZ e/kq dksyksukbZtlZ izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izfr jktdqekj jkor tks fo}ku flfoy tt] ¼ofj"B Js.kh½] bykgkckn ds U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS] dks og fcuk fdlh LFkxu ds &6 ekg ds vUnj fof/k vuqlkj fuLrkfjr djsaA fn0& 21&10&2021@v
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, as the legal guardian of the child-custody respondent, can invoke the court's supervision under Article 227 for an administrative order affecting the child-custody respondent's
2 provisions across 2 enactments
fKkuuh; 'k
rkjk dqekj ;kno
Ekuuh; 'k
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
