The High Court held that there is no reason to expedite the petitioner's divorce case pending in the Family Court, thereby dismissing the Article 227 petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1763 of 2021
Petitioner :- Shivangi Gupta And Another Respondent :- Principal Judge Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
By the instant petition, petitioners seek the following relief:
“to issue a direction/ writ of mandamus commanding the Respondent/ Principal Judge, Family Court, Chandausi at Sambhal, District Sambhal to decide the Case No. 51 of 2021 (Smt. Shivangi Gupta Vs. Jatin Varshney) by fixing an early date, filed by the petitioners U/s 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act.”
On perusal of the pleadings and material placed on record, this Court does not find any reason to expedite the case.
In view thereof, petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate expedite application. In the event, such an application is filed, it is expected the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.7.2021
P. Sri.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the Family Court to fix an early date for deciding a divorce petition filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Shivangi Gupta, And Another
Principal Judge
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
