The writ petitioner and respondent resolved their differences out of court. Since the dispute was settled, the writ petition was consigned to records with no substantive orders made on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9688 of 2020
Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhijit Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Habib Ahmad
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Habib Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned State Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have already resolved their differences out of Court.
Since the issue has been resolved out of Court, the writ petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 17.6.2020 Ranjeet Sahu
Surendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
