Writ petition filed by Arun Kumar petition against a respondent bank. The High Court held the petition not maintainable on the face of it and dismissed it without costs. The court disposed of the matter in a brief order.
Writ petition dismissed; no costs awarded to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1182 of 2020
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramnath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Trivedi
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
From the record, it reflects that the petitioner has a lis against the respondent bank.
The writ petition, on the face of it, is not maintainable.
The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sri Manish Trivedi appears for the respondent bank.
Order Date :- 21.1.2020 rk
Arun Kumar
State of U.P.
Another
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
