Petition dismissed because controversy was already adjudicated by the Supreme Court and the matter was consigned to records without further hearing.
Writ petition consigned to records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9524 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ashutosh
Respondent :- Central Board Of Secondary Education And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Malviya,Syed Fahim Ahmed
Counsel for Respondent :- Hridai Narain Pandey
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.N. Pandey for the respondents.
Controversy raised in this petition has already been adjudicated by the Apex Court under the order dated 26.6.2020 in a bunch of writ petitions being Writ Petition (Civil) No.566 of 2020 (Amit Bathla and others Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and another). A notification has also been issued on 25.6.2020 by the Central Board of Secondary Education. Rights of the parties would be governed, accordingly.
In that view of the matter, no further grievance survives.
Writ petition, accordingly, is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 9.7.2020 Anil
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amit Bathla and others Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and anotherReferred¶8
Writ Petition (Civil) No.566 of 2020 (Amit Bathla and others Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and another)
Ashutosh
Central Board Of Secondary Education
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
