The petitioner informally notified the Court that cause for the writ petition had expired because he joined the department. The court found no dispute and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7192 of 2018
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Singh,Durgesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Man Singh Verma,Siddharth Nandan
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
On the matter being taken up today, Shri H.P. Sahi, learned counsel for the petitioner informs to the Court that cause for filing the present writ petition no more survives as the petitioner has already joined the department.
Learned counsel for the respondents has not disputed the said facts.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.12.2020
A. Pandey
Arvind Kumar
State Of U.P.
Other 1
Other 2
Other 3
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
