The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear to press the matter. All interim orders were discharged.
None; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36534 of 2019
Petitioner :- Dharmendra Gas Agency Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Nandan,Pranat Chaudhri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manu Saxena
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. However, Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 2.1.2020 IrfanUddin
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Dharmendra Gas Agency
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
