Single judge dismissed writ petition as infructuous because petitioner alleged availing the relief sought and efflux of time. No other substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27589 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Kiranlata Jaiswal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manas Bhargava,Akhilesh Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None appears to press this writ petition on behalf of the petitioner.
This writ petition is of the year 2006 and as per the prayer made by the petitioner, it appears that the relief sought by the petitioner has been availed by him and he is not interested to contest this writ petition.
Accordingly, due to efflux of time, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any stands vacated.
It is further provided that, in case, the present writ petition survives, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for recalling this order.
Order Date :- 6.3.2020
SFH
Kiranlata Jaiswal
State of U.P.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
