The Hon'ble Court held that a petitioner aggrieved by a compromise forced during the pendency of a civil suit has a remedy of approaching the Civil Court itself. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The writ petition was disposed of with observations that the petitioner must approach the Civil Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24086 of 2020
Petitioner :- Shiv Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girja Shanker Mishra,Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
If the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that some compromise was being forced upon him during the pendency of the civil suit which was filed by the petitioner then the petitioner has a remedy of approaching the Civil Court itself.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020 Siddhant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner forced into a civil suit compromise has a remedy under writ jurisdiction.
Shiv Narayan
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
