The court directed the recall application filed by the petitioner on 18.9.2019 to be decided within one month of this order without examining the merits of the underlying case.
Directed the recall application dated 18.9.2019 to be decided within one month from the date of presentation of the certified copy of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17488 of 2020
Petitioner :- Kaushal Prasad Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the restoration application moved by him against the order dated 31.7.2019 which was passed in a suit filed by the respondent no.4 was not being decided. A prayer has, therefore, been made that the recall application dated 18.9.2019 be decided expeditiously.
Under such circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, it is directed that the recall application dated 18.9.2019 filed by the petitioner be decided within a period of one month from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. The copy of this order shall be duly certified by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.12.2020 GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the recall application filed by the petitioner on 18.9.2019 should be decided expeditiously
Kaushal Prasad Pandey
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
